Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 38: 3946320231223004, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38217433

RESUMO

The symptoms of celery allergy are mainly presented as oral allergy symptom, but there are several case reports of patients who experienced anaphylaxis. Defensin (Api g 7), as a novel allergen in celery root, was described in 2022 r. The female patient had a history of several episodes of dyspnea and cough, associated with ingestion of spice mixes containing dried celery. Up to the point of hospitalization, there were no objective tests, either sIgE or skin prick tests, that would confirm celery sensitization. During hospitalization, patient had a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge with cooked celery. The patient was sensitized to mugwort defensin Art v 1. An inhibition assay with celery allergen extract was performed to prove cross-sensitization between Art v 1 and celery allergen responsible for symptoms in the patient. In conclusion, Api g 7 is an important celery allergen that can be responsible for severe reactions. Its cross-reactivity with Art v 1 is characteristic. Negative diagnostic tests with celery do not exclude Api g 7 sensitization.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Humanos , Feminino , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/diagnóstico , Pólen , Proteínas de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos , Defensinas , Testes Cutâneos/efeitos adversos
2.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol ; 40(5): 661-669, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38028417

RESUMO

Introduction: The key to the correct diagnosis of shrimp allergy is a qualification to the most efficient diagnostic method and later interpretation of the result. To achieve this, it is necessary to apply a diagnostic strategy relevant to each patient's clinical situation and approach every case individually. Aim: In this study the allergen profile of shrimp-sensitized patients was analysed using ALEX2 Allergy Explorer. Material and methods: This study includes 50 adult patients with positive prick-by-prick tests with tiger shrimp bought from the local eco-market and an elevated concentration of IgE specific to the shrimp allergen extract (ImmunoCap). A total of 35 patients with negative skin prick tests with shrimp and not detectable sIgE shrimp in ImmunoCap were included in the control group. All patients had ALEX2 Allergy Explorer microarray test. Results: In the shrimp-sensitized group, 22 patients were sensitized to at least one allergen component of Penaeus monodon, 20 patients were sensitized to crab, and 20 were sensitized to lobster. Only 15 (30%) patients were sensitized to the Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) allergen extract in ALEX2 and only 12 (24%) to Shrimp mix (Litopenaeus setiferus, Farfantepenaeus aztecus, Farfantepenaeus dourarum). Conclusions: Sensitization to shrimp tropomyosin in the research group was present only in 34% of cases. There may be other shrimp allergen components, not available in ALEX2, which are responsible for shrimp sensitization.

3.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol ; 40(2): 298-307, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37312903

RESUMO

Introduction: The basic method of treating food hypersensitivity is the elimination diet, which is difficult for the patient in many ways. Aim: To identify the main problems faced by patients with symptoms of food intolerance. Material and methods: The survey was conducted from February 2021 to December 2021. The survey was posted in Polish thematic groups on Facebook, dedicated to people with food intolerances. The survey contained 34 questions about food intolerances and the use of elimination diets. Questions about the cost of the diet and difficulties in applying the elimination diet were included. Results: There was no statistically significant relationship between the type of food intolerance and the body mass index of patients. It was found that people with lactose intolerance had a lower increase in food expenditure since the introduction of the diet than those without lactose intolerance. Almost half of the respondents did not find a difference in expenses. 21% of respondents noticed an increase of PLN 50-100/month, 19% - PLN 10-50/month, and only 6% above PLN 200/month. Circumstances where following an elimination diet is a particular challenge included intense private and professional lifestyle, prolonged stay away from home, and lack of time to prepare meals at home. Conclusions: The difficulties in maintaining an elimination diet are dependent on the patient's work and lifestyle. The cost of equivalents of intolerant products is also an important factor to consider when analysing the source of problems in maintaining the diet.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...